Google, Authors Try To Answer Book Deal Concerns

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Google and the Authors Guild filed a new version of a deal to create a massive online library on Friday in hopes of answering antitrust and copyright concerns in the United States and overseas.

Google's plan to put millions of books online has been praised for expanding access to books but has also been criticized on antitrust, copyright and privacy grounds.

According to a 30-page court filing made by the parties late on Friday, a section was eliminated that required the book registry created by the settlement to give Google at least as good a deal as any competitor.

In another shift, money from unclaimed or orphan works will go to an independent fiduciary rather than go to the registry.

The Justice Department, in September, had pointed to that arrangement as a conflict of interest since it was the registry that was also tasked with locating writers and paying them for their online sales.

Under the new deal, unclaimed funds will eventually go to charities.

The class action agreement must be approved by a court, and the Justice Department had recommended that the previous version be rejected because of concerns that it might break antitrust law. It also had concerns about violations of copyright law.

"We've had numerous discussions and quite a lot of dialogue with the Justice Department and feel we've addressed their key concerns," said Richard Sarnoff, president of Bertelsmann Digital Media.

The agreement is designed to settle a 2005 class action lawsuit filed against Google by authors and publishers who had accused the search engine giant of copyright infringement for scanning libraries full of books.

INTERNATIONAL OBJECTIONS

As part of the amended deal, books in the registry would be reduced to those copyrighted in the United States or published in Australia, Canada and the United Kingdom.

There had been significant international objection to the deal on the grounds that non-English speaking authors, in particular, were represented by the authors and publishers who sued Google but had no say in negotiating the deal.

Dan Clancy, architect of the Google program, said the search giant would reach out to authors' groups overseas.

German book publishers have been up in arms about the deal, and on Sept. 24 they criticized European regulators for failing to take a stand against the settlement.

The French publishing house La Martiniere, the French Publishers' Association and authors' group SGDL asked a Paris court to fine Google for infringement for digitizing their books.

On Oct. 22, a group representing authors in China accused Google of copyright infringement.

Critics of the deal have been a varied group that includes Yahoo, Amazon, Microsoft, the National Writers Union, Consumer Watchdog and singer Arlo Guthrie.

The case is Authors Guild et al v Google Inc 05-08136 in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (Manhattan).

(Reporting by Diane Bartz, Editing by Sandra Maler)

Rate This Article:

Comments:

Post A Comment

You are not logged in, please do so at the top of the page.

Recent Posts in Fighting Corporateering:

Google facing close DOJ scrutiny on ITA

Despite what the spinmeisters over at Google's Public Policy Blog would have you believe, the Internet giant is facing tough...

Read More »

Health reform regulation scorecard: The big stuff is headed to court

Wouldn't it be great if we could all deduct our federal income and investment taxes from next year's income? And if we could also deduct that stress-reducing trip to a spa in Bora Bora? And if the government would just take our word for it? Fantasy for us, but the health insurance industry think that's what federal health reform ought to allow, on a corporate scale.

Read More »

Four House members blast Google-Verizon plan; call on FCC to act

Four members of the House Energy and Commerce Committee’s Subcommittee on Communications, Technology, and the Internet, on Monday ...

Read More »

" Do Not Track Me" gains traction in Washington

I'm just back from a sweltering week in Washington, DC, convinced that those of us who care about protecting consumers' online privacy have reason for optimism.  There is growing interest in creating a "Do Not Track...

Read More »

Saturday in Seattle: Live demonstrators, zombie insurance lawyers, someone's caving to lobbyists

It's livelier Saturday at the National Association of Insurance Commissioners meeting in Seattle. Most refreshing was a medium-sized street demonstration, with forays into meeting rooms, by young and old demonstrators protesting lobbyist influence on health care reform. They handed out "lobbyist disinfectant packs," including soap and face masks, and demanded that regulators do their job for consumers. The sponsor was the "Puget Sound Alliance for Retired Americans," and it was backed by Health Care for America Now, a national group that is finally engaging with vigor on regulation issues.

Read More »

« Previous View All Next »

Forward This Page To A Friend

Why Won't Congress Look Into Google's Wi-Spy Scandal?