Shouldn't We Be Able To Charge Companies For Our Lost Time?

MARKETPLACE - National Public Radio

The following commentary was broadcast on Marketplace on National Public Radio on Wednesday, June 16, 2004.
Click here to listen to the audio
(scroll down to bottom of linked page)
------------------

DAVID BROWN, anchor: You sure can make money with a click of a button. Credit card companies do it all the time. Late bill? Click. Ouch. But you know, fingers can be button-happy, and businesses can make mistakes. And who's left sorting it all out? Well, commentator Jamie Court says it's time consumers figured out how to turn the tables.

JAMIE COURT: If time is money, why are corporations the only ones who charge for wasting it? When our bills are late, banks, credit card companies and insurers charge us money. But no matter how much of our time it takes to fix their mistakes, we never get paid. If you make $54,000 per year, you hand over $27 for every hour you spend doing the lost paperwork for your refund. If your annual pay is $110,000, the two hours you wasted at home because the cable company guy came late cost you $110.

So what would happen if we turned the tables? Far fewer mistakes and much less waiting, that's what. Customer service satisfaction levels would rise from their current cellar-dweller ratings. Once the line is drawn, corporations are likely to avoid it, just like they do the $11,000 fine for breaking the Do Not Call line. HMOs made the same adjustment. After California let patients collect for delays in their treatment, HMOs started paying for care in legitimate cases rather than haggle over the need for that care and then face the penalty.

Consider this solution: You could charge for your time only after a gross misuse of it. Say, if you have to spend more than two hours to fix a billing error and the resulting spot on your credit report. Government would establish guidelines, you would have to provide documentation: letters, phone bills, postmarks. And then you could collect via mail or small claims court in contested claims.

This isn't pie in the sky. I mean, just a few years ago, who would have imagined that every errant telemarketing call would cost the offending company the price of a Hyundai? Who knows, in another decade, maybe 20 minutes in voice mail hell will be worth at least a burger and fries. In Los Angeles, this is Jamie Court for MARKETPLACE.

BROWN: Consumer activist Jamie Court is the author of "Corporateering."




Rate This Article:

Comments:

Post A Comment

You are not logged in, please do so at the top of the page.

Recent Posts in Fighting Corporateering:

Google facing close DOJ scrutiny on ITA

Despite what the spinmeisters over at Google's Public Policy Blog would have you believe, the Internet giant is facing tough...

Read More »

Health reform regulation scorecard: The big stuff is headed to court

Wouldn't it be great if we could all deduct our federal income and investment taxes from next year's income? And if we could also deduct that stress-reducing trip to a spa in Bora Bora? And if the government would just take our word for it? Fantasy for us, but the health insurance industry think that's what federal health reform ought to allow, on a corporate scale.

Read More »

Four House members blast Google-Verizon plan; call on FCC to act

Four members of the House Energy and Commerce Committee’s Subcommittee on Communications, Technology, and the Internet, on Monday ...

Read More »

" Do Not Track Me" gains traction in Washington

I'm just back from a sweltering week in Washington, DC, convinced that those of us who care about protecting consumers' online privacy have reason for optimism.  There is growing interest in creating a "Do Not Track...

Read More »

Saturday in Seattle: Live demonstrators, zombie insurance lawyers, someone's caving to lobbyists

It's livelier Saturday at the National Association of Insurance Commissioners meeting in Seattle. Most refreshing was a medium-sized street demonstration, with forays into meeting rooms, by young and old demonstrators protesting lobbyist influence on health care reform. They handed out "lobbyist disinfectant packs," including soap and face masks, and demanded that regulators do their job for consumers. The sponsor was the "Puget Sound Alliance for Retired Americans," and it was backed by Health Care for America Now, a national group that is finally engaging with vigor on regulation issues.

Read More »

View All Next »

Forward This Page To A Friend

Why Won't Congress Look Into Google's Wi-Spy Scandal?