Judge Rejects Amazon Bid To Scrap Google Pact

NEW YORK  - A federal judge has rejected Amazon.com Inc's request that he withdraw preliminary approval of a settlement between Google Inc and groups of authors and publishers to digitize millions of books.

In a Tuesday ruling, U.S. District Judge Denny Chin said he planned to conduct a "thorough fairness analysis" of the settlement at a February 18, 2010 hearing and Amazon could argue its case then.

Seattle-based Amazon, which sells digital books, did not immediately return a call seeking comment.

The settlement is designed to resolve a 2005 lawsuit by authors and publishers that accused Google of copyright infringement for scanning libraries of books into digital form, enabling contents to be seen online.

Google, the Authors Guild and publishers last month submitted a revised agreement aimed at answering antitrust and copyright concerns raised by the U.S. Justice Department and others.

To answer antitrust concerns, a section was eliminated that had required the book registry created by the settlement to give Google at least as good a deal as any competitor.

In another shift, money from works whose authors cannot be found will go to an independent fiduciary.

The deal had also been challenged overseas. As part of the agreement, books in the registry would be reduced to those published in the United States, Australia, Canada and the United Kingdom.

The Justice Department has until February 4 to comment on the revised settlement, court records show.

Critics of the deal have been a varied group that includes Amazon, Yahoo, Microsoft, the National Writers Union, Consumer Watchdog and singer Arlo Guthrie.

The case is The Authors Guild et al v. Google, Inc., U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 05-08136.

Rate This Article:

Comments:

Post A Comment

You are not logged in, please do so at the top of the page.

Recent Posts in Fighting Corporateering:

Google facing close DOJ scrutiny on ITA

Despite what the spinmeisters over at Google's Public Policy Blog would have you believe, the Internet giant is facing tough...

Read More »

Health reform regulation scorecard: The big stuff is headed to court

Wouldn't it be great if we could all deduct our federal income and investment taxes from next year's income? And if we could also deduct that stress-reducing trip to a spa in Bora Bora? And if the government would just take our word for it? Fantasy for us, but the health insurance industry think that's what federal health reform ought to allow, on a corporate scale.

Read More »

Four House members blast Google-Verizon plan; call on FCC to act

Four members of the House Energy and Commerce Committee’s Subcommittee on Communications, Technology, and the Internet, on Monday ...

Read More »

" Do Not Track Me" gains traction in Washington

I'm just back from a sweltering week in Washington, DC, convinced that those of us who care about protecting consumers' online privacy have reason for optimism.  There is growing interest in creating a "Do Not Track...

Read More »

Saturday in Seattle: Live demonstrators, zombie insurance lawyers, someone's caving to lobbyists

It's livelier Saturday at the National Association of Insurance Commissioners meeting in Seattle. Most refreshing was a medium-sized street demonstration, with forays into meeting rooms, by young and old demonstrators protesting lobbyist influence on health care reform. They handed out "lobbyist disinfectant packs," including soap and face masks, and demanded that regulators do their job for consumers. The sponsor was the "Puget Sound Alliance for Retired Americans," and it was backed by Health Care for America Now, a national group that is finally engaging with vigor on regulation issues.

Read More »

View All Next »

Forward This Page To A Friend

Why Won't Congress Look Into Google's Wi-Spy Scandal?