<?xml version='1.0' encoding='iso-8859-1'?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>

<title>Consumer Watchdog Updates</title>
<link>http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/feed/</link>
<description>Updates from Consumer Watchdog, a nationally recognized consumer group working to protect and improve the lives of American consumers and taxpayers.</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<ttl>15</ttl>
<atom:link href="http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

<item>
<title>Google search ad, what dat?</title>
<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nfl.com/superbowl/44&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Super Bowl XLIV&lt;/a&gt; wasn't only a first for the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.neworleanssaints.com/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;New Orleans Saints&lt;/a&gt;, it was also a landmark for Internet giant, Google.&amp;nbsp;...</description> 
<link>http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/corporateering/articles/?storyId=32660</link>
<guid>http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/corporateering/articles/?storyId=32660</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 16:52:00 PST</pubDate>  
</item>
<item>
<title>Blue Cross's taste of what's to come if health reform fails</title>
<description>&lt;p&gt;
Those of us who have health insurance--or think we have health
insurance--can get complacent about whether the nation needs that big,
complicated health reform legislation. But just try getting sick. Is
your insurance even real? If it is, can you afford it after the latest
round of price hikes? Is your deductible so big that paying it will
mean financial ruin? Check out these stories and think about what the
White House and Congress, by wimping out again on health reform, will
condemn all of us to...
&lt;/p&gt;</description> 
<link>http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/patients/articles/?storyId=32659</link>
<guid>http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/patients/articles/?storyId=32659</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 14:29:00 PST</pubDate>  
</item>
<item>
<title>Consumer Watchdog and Steve Poizner Behind Battle Against Mercury Insurance</title>
<description>Like many Californians, I was burned by Mercury auto insurance in the
90's. After my rates went up, despite a &amp;quot;discounted&amp;quot; quote by the
agent, I was left wondering what, exactly, I had done. It took me a
couple of years, but I eventually went through the headache of swapping
carriers. Now, California's Insurance Commissioner Steve Poizner has released a
well-documented, 275-page report that details some of the, um,
indiscretions used by Mercury Insurance that violate Proposition 103, a
law enacted in 1988. Ah yes, the 80's are still coming back to bite us
in the...</description> 
<link>http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/insurance/articles/?storyId=32658</link>
<guid>http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/insurance/articles/?storyId=32658</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 14:22:45 PST</pubDate>  
</item>
<item>
<title>Internal Gov't Reports Show Mercury Insurance Discriminated Against Soldiers Unemployed, Domestic Partners, Small Biz - Reveal Motive Behind Prop 17</title>
<description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Mercury Insurance Initiative &amp;ndash; Prop 17 &amp;ndash; Will Legalize Unlawful Surcharges Uncovered by State Investigators&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
Santa Monica, CA -- Newly released internal government reports show
that Mercury Insurance Company, the sponsor of Proposition 17 on
California's June ballot, has a history of discrimination against
members of the U.S. military, the unemployed, the disabled, small
businesspeople and unmarried adults living together. Consumer Watchdog
pointed out that these and other Californians are now targeted for
massive surcharges by Mercury&amp;rsquo;s ballot measure.</description> 
<link>http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/insurance/articles/?storyId=32657</link>
<guid>http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/insurance/articles/?storyId=32657</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 12:01:00 PST</pubDate>  
</item>
<item>
<title>Consumer Watchdog Warns Against Making Financial Reform Bill Weaker on Consumer Protection Than Nation's Largest Bank Will Accept</title>
<description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Calls on Sen. Dodd To Re-Affirm Commitment to Independent Consumer Financial Protection Agency&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;u&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/u&gt;&lt;em&gt;Washington, DC&lt;/em&gt; -- Consumer Watchdog called on Senate Banking
Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd to re-affirm his commitment to an
independent consumer financial regulator today after the nation&amp;rsquo;s
largest bank announced it would not oppose the agency.
&lt;/p&gt;</description> 
<link>http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/politicians/articles/?storyId=32656</link>
<guid>http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/politicians/articles/?storyId=32656</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 10:07:39 PST</pubDate>  
</item>
<item>
<title>Insurer May Have Violated Law, Report Reveals</title>
<description>A high-profile California insurance company that is backing a
controversial insurance measure on the June ballot has engaged in
practices that may be illegal, including deceptive pricing and
discrimination against consumers such as active members of the military
and drivers of emergency vehicles, according to a state report obtained
by The Chronicle.</description> 
<link>http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/insurance/articles/?storyId=32651</link>
<guid>http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/insurance/articles/?storyId=32651</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 08:32:09 PST</pubDate>  
</item>
<item>
<title>Chronicle reveals discrimination at Mercury Insurance, Soldiers targeted</title>
<description>&lt;p&gt;
In case all those ads about how great insurance companies are was starting to make you feel all fuzzy inside, Carla Marinucci at the San Francisco Chronicle just posted a revealing and disturbing look into the widespread discrimination at California's 3rd largest auto insurer, Mercury Insurance....
&lt;/p&gt;</description> 
<link>http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/insurance/articles/?storyId=32632</link>
<guid>http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/insurance/articles/?storyId=32632</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 22:01:00 PST</pubDate>  
</item>
<item>
<title>Internal Documents Reveal Widespread Discrimination At Mercury Insurance</title>
<description>Internal reports prepared by California Department of Insurance (CDI)
investigators show that Mercury Insurance Company used a variety of
internal company rules &amp;ndash; many unwritten &amp;ndash; to overcharge or refuse to
sell insurance to many Californians it deemed &amp;quot;unacceptable,&amp;quot; including
Americans serving in the military, small businesspeople, unmarried
people living together, people with diabetes, and the unemployed.</description> 
<link>http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/insurance/articles/?storyId=32615</link>
<guid>http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/insurance/articles/?storyId=32615</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 13:47:00 PST</pubDate>  
</item>
<item>
<title>DC Week in Review: All about banks</title>
<description>&lt;p&gt;
It was hard to get away from Wall Street in Washington this week. Former Citibank Chairman John Reed,
free to speak his mind in retirement, endorsed an independent consumer
agency in testimony before the Senate Banking panel on Thursday...
&lt;/p&gt;</description> 
<link>http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/politicians/articles/?storyId=32613</link>
<guid>http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/politicians/articles/?storyId=32613</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 12:50:00 PST</pubDate>  
</item>
<item>
<title>Eli's Egoland?</title>
<description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;A billionaire twisted arms to use public land for luxury shops. Now Eli Broad wants to put his art there&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Consumer advocate Jamie Court feels that the conflict is offset somewhat by
the billionaire's purpose - an art museum rather than, say, a condo
tower. &amp;quot;It's not like housing that he owned that he would profit from,&amp;quot;
says Court. &amp;quot;On the other hand, should that entitle him to have his pet
project gain special concessions because of the knowledge he has?&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;</description> 
<link>http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/corporateering/articles/?storyId=32612</link>
<guid>http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/corporateering/articles/?storyId=32612</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 12:47:03 PST</pubDate>  
</item>
<item>
<title>Justice Department Objects to Revised Google Books Settlement</title>
<description>The Department of Justice filed a statement of interest February 4 saying that that despite &amp;ldquo;substantial progress&amp;rdquo;&amp;nbsp; it still had objections to the proposed settlement of lawsuits challenging Google&amp;rsquo;s Book Search project, noting that the agreement continued to raise copyright, antitrust, and class certification&amp;nbsp;issues. Consumer Watchdog, which had filed a brief opposing the settlement, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/corporateering/articles/?storyId=32602&quot;&gt;praised&lt;/a&gt; the Justice Department&amp;rsquo;s stance. &amp;ldquo;The Department of Justice should
be commended for standing firm in opposing this private deal that
unfairly benefits the narrow agenda of one company,&amp;rdquo; said John M.
Simpson, a consumer advocate with the nonprofit group. &amp;ldquo;The DOJ filing
and the outpouring of other briefs from around the world opposing the
amended settlement, such as the one filed by Consumer Watchdog, make it
almost certain Judge Denny Chin will reject the&amp;nbsp;deal.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;</description> 
<link>http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/corporateering/articles/?storyId=32611</link>
<guid>http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/corporateering/articles/?storyId=32611</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 12:18:59 PST</pubDate>  
</item>
<item>
<title>US DoJ Dissatisfied With Google Book Deal</title>
<description>&lt;p&gt;
San Francisco, CA -- The US Department of Justice on Thursday said it was still not satisfied with an agreement on digitising books made between Google, authors and publishers, despite &amp;ldquo;substantial progress&amp;rdquo; on amendments to the settlement. Consumer Watchdog, the consumer group, welcomed the DoJ&amp;rsquo;s objections to the deal. &amp;ldquo;Google offered only minimal amendments to its original flawed deal and
the key problems remain,&amp;rdquo; said John Simpson, a spokesman. &amp;ldquo;The DoJ filing and the outpouring of other briefs from around the
world opposing the amended settlement make it almost certain [Judge
Chin] will reject the deal.&amp;rdquo;
&lt;/p&gt;</description> 
<link>http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/corporateering/articles/?storyId=32610</link>
<guid>http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/corporateering/articles/?storyId=32610</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 12:13:57 PST</pubDate>  
</item>
<item>
<title>Justice Says Revised Google Books Deal Still Problematic</title>
<description>The Justice Department announced late Thursday that it still has problems with a proposed settlement between the publishing industry and Google over the firm's plans for developing a global online library, CongressDaily reported. In a statement, the Open Book Alliance, which opposes the settlement,
applauded the Justice Department's filing saying, it will &amp;quot;help to
preserve competition, promote innovation and protect the public
interest. The Department of Justice has made it crystal clear that the
proposal before the court is overreaching and cannot be approved.&amp;quot; The
alliance members include Amazon.com, Microsoft and Yahoo, as well as
some library, writer and publishing groups. John Simpson with Consumer
Watchdog also praised the department in a statement for &amp;quot;standing firm
in opposing this private deal that unfairly benefits the narrow agenda
of one company&amp;quot; and predicted the court will reject it.</description> 
<link>http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/corporateering/articles/?storyId=32609</link>
<guid>http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/corporateering/articles/?storyId=32609</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 11:36:26 PST</pubDate>  
</item>
<item>
<title>Justice Dept Says Google Books Deal Troubled</title>
<description>WASHINGTON, D.C. - Changes that Google Inc and the Authors Guild made to an ambitious plan to create a massive online library were inadequate because they fail to address antitrust and copyright concerns, the U.S. Justice Department said on Thursday. Critics of the deal have been a varied group that includes Yahoo
Inc, Amazon Inc, Microsoft Inc, the National Writers Union and Consumer
Watchdog.&lt;br /&gt;</description> 
<link>http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/corporateering/articles/?storyId=32607</link>
<guid>http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/corporateering/articles/?storyId=32607</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 11:28:26 PST</pubDate>  
</item>
<item>
<title>Feds Still Troubled By Google's Digital Book Deal</title>
<description>SAN FRANCISCO, CA -- The U.S. Justice Department still thinks a proposal to give Google the digital rights to millions of hard-to-find books threatens to stifle competition and undermine copyright laws, despite revisions aimed at easing those concerns. Consumer Watchdog, one of the groups fighting the settlement, applauded
the Justice Department for taking a stand against a deal &amp;quot;that unfairly
benefits the narrow agenda of one company.&amp;quot;</description> 
<link>http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/corporateering/articles/?storyId=32606</link>
<guid>http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/corporateering/articles/?storyId=32606</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 11:09:58 PST</pubDate>  
</item>
<item>
<title>DOJ: Thumbs Down Again to Google Book Search Settlement</title>
<description>In a big blow to Google's efforts to build a massive digital-books marketplace and library, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has come out against the revised agreement to settle copyright lawsuits brought against Google by authors and publishers. Consumer Watchdog, a critic of the settlement, praised the DOJ's
opinion and predicted the judge will not approve the proposal. &amp;quot;The
Department of Justice should be commended for standing firm in opposing
this private deal that unfairly benefits the narrow agenda of one
company,&amp;quot; said John M. Simpson, a consumer advocate with Consumer
Watchdog, in a statement.</description> 
<link>http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/corporateering/articles/?storyId=32603</link>
<guid>http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/corporateering/articles/?storyId=32603</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 17:52:49 PST</pubDate>  
</item>
<item>
<title>Consumer Watchdog Praises DOJ for Opposing Google Books Settlement</title>
<description>SANTA MONICA, CA &amp;mdash; Consumer Watchdog praised the U.S. Department of
Justice today for opposing the amended Google Books Settlement. The DOJ
said that while there were improvements in the amended settlement,
problems with class certification, copyright and antitrust issues
remained.</description> 
<link>http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/corporateering/articles/?storyId=32602</link>
<guid>http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/corporateering/articles/?storyId=32602</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 16:46:28 PST</pubDate>  
</item>
<item>
<title>Google, NSA Partnership Raises Privacy Hackles</title>
<description>&lt;p&gt;
The revelation that Google Inc. is partnering with the National Security Agency to probe a widespread cyber attack has quickened the pulse of privacy advocates.
&lt;/p&gt;</description> 
<link>http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/corporateering/articles/?storyId=32601</link>
<guid>http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/corporateering/articles/?storyId=32601</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 16:15:00 PST</pubDate>  
</item>
<item>
<title>Google asking spy agency for help</title>
<description>Google has apparently gone to the super secret National Security Agency seeking help in preventing cyber attacks.</description> 
<link>http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/corporateering/articles/?storyId=32599</link>
<guid>http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/corporateering/articles/?storyId=32599</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 12:44:00 PST</pubDate>  
</item>
<item>
<title>DOJ Not Pleased With Latest Google Book Agreement</title>
<description>&lt;p&gt;
Although the amended settlement agreement for Google's Book Search addressed some concerns the U.S. Justice Department had, it still could give the company anticompetitive advantages in the digital book marketplace, the agency said on Thursday. The nonprofit advocacy group Consumer Watchdog praised the Justice Department's stance. &amp;quot;The settlement still abuses the class-action mechanism and purports to
enroll absent class members automatically into new business
'opportunities,' in violation of current copyright laws,&amp;quot; Consumer
Watchdog reiterated from its friend-of-the-court brief opposing the
agreement as modified.
&lt;/p&gt;</description> 
<link>http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/corporateering/articles/?storyId=32608</link>
<guid>http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/corporateering/articles/?storyId=32608</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 11:29:00 PST</pubDate>  
</item>
<item>
<title>Two Congressmen ask Justice to scrutinize Google Books deal, government will comment on revised deal Thursday</title>
<description>&lt;p&gt;
Two Texas Congressmen &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/reps-gonzalez--green-ask-doj-to-scrutinize-google-books-settlement-protect-individual-authors--publishers-83477272.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;have asked the U.S.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/reps-gonzalez--green-ask-doj-to-scrutinize-google-books-settlement-protect-individual-authors--publishers-83477272.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt; of Justice&lt;/a&gt; to ensure that&amp;nbsp; the proposed Google Books Settlement not hurt minority publishers and small businesses. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.justice.gov/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;The department&lt;/a&gt; is scheduled to file its view of the amended settlement in federal court on Thursday.
&lt;/p&gt;</description> 
<link>http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/corporateering/articles/?storyId=32577</link>
<guid>http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/corporateering/articles/?storyId=32577</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 16:26:00 PST</pubDate>  
</item>
<item>
<title>New Jerseyans Could Soon Be Able to Shop Across State Lines for Health Insurance</title>
<description>If insurers can sell beyond state lines, the concern is that consumers
would be attracted to the least comprehensive policies because they'd
be cheapest. For example, someone could buy a policy in a state that
doesn't mandate coverage of diabetic supplies. &amp;quot;You get what you pay
for in these policies (and) consumers won't realize it until they are
sick and it's too late,&amp;quot; said Jerry Flanagan, health care policy
analyst for Consumer Watchdog, a California consumer health group.</description> 
<link>http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/patients/articles/?storyId=32593</link>
<guid>http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/patients/articles/?storyId=32593</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:19:00 PST</pubDate>  
</item>
<item>
<title>Hot Fuel Fix in Deep Freeze</title>
<description>&lt;img class=&quot;icon&quot; src=&quot;http://www.oilwatchdog.org/images/blog/5844684/IN_IN_WT.gif&quot; /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
When a private club that is too cozy with corporations make the rules
on consumer protection, guess what happens? The National Conference on
Weights and Measures met last week voted to
just dump years' worth of proposals and plans to fix the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.oilwatchdog.org/articles/?storyId=5821&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;hot fuel&amp;quot; ripoff.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/a&gt; It reminded me of the old Soviet trick of removing purged bureaucrats from ceremonial photos.
&lt;/p&gt;</description> 
<link>http://www.oilwatchdog.org/?storyId=32557</link>
<guid>http://www.oilwatchdog.org/?storyId=32557</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 17:35:27 PST</pubDate>  
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
