Consumer Watchdog To Google: Publicly Disclose Your Lobbying Positions On Electronic Medical Record Provisions In Stimulus Bill

Santa Monica, CA -- A national consumer group today called upon Google to publicly disclose its lobbying positions on the electronic medical record provisions of the financial stimulus legislation given a new account by an independent journalist that Google's presence on the bill was felt on Capitol Hill.

Consumer Watchdog called on Google's public policy team for an immediate answer. The letter follows:

Robert Boorstin
Director of Corporate and Policy Communications
Google, Inc.

Pablo Chavez
Senior Policy Counsel
Google, Inc.
 
Dear Mr. Boorstin and Mr. Chavez,

Last week Google wrote that our consumer group’s report of a rumored Google lobbying effort on Capitol Hill, reportedly aimed at limiting the current prohibition on the sale of electronic medical records in the economic stimulus bill, was “100 percent false and unfounded.”  The Google blog appears at: http://googlepublicpolicy.blogspot.com/2009/01/consumer-watchdog-wrong-on-medical.html
 
Now an independent journalist has produced other reports of Google’s lobbying over the medical privacy provisions of the stimulus legislation.  George Lauer, iHealthBeat Features Editor, wrote on January 30 that "[t]wo other privacy advocates and a Congressional staffer who did not want to go on record said they have heard reports of Google representatives contacting Congress members' offices."  Lauer’s article is available at: http://www.ihealthbeat.org/Features/2009/Stimulus-Package-Brings-Out-Wide-Range-of-Privacy-Opinions.aspx
 
Currently, Google Health provides for the transfer of electronic medical records from health care providers to Google’s database.  While Google's methods for obtaining and using records are opaque, clearly Google has an interest in these provisions of the stimulus legislation, and as Mr. Lauer's article illustrates, Google’s presence on the Hill was felt.
 
Google’s purported mission is to create open information across the world.  We ask now that you explain clearly and openly the policy positions Google advocated on the Hill with regard to the electronic medical technology provisions of the stimulus package, as well as the positions Google will advocate this week on the same legislation in the U.S. Senate.
 
Lobbying on Capitol Hill is, as you know, a less than transparent enterprise with policy positions advocated orally, with no paper trail.  Given Google's adamant denial of the claim that Google lobbied to alter current medical privacy protections, countervailing reports from multiple sources that Google lobbied on these provisions, and your company’s outspoken commitment to openness, we ask that Google immediately and publicly disclose its positions with regard to the electronic medical records technology section in the stimulus bill, including any amendments Google sought in the legislation previously or will seek in the Senate.  The U.S. Senate, the American public and Google users deserve no less.
 
Sincerely,

Jerry Flanagan
(310) 889-4912
 
cc:

Eric Schmidt, CEO
Larry Page, Co-Founders
Sergey Brin, Co-Founder

Rate This Article:

Comments:

Post A Comment

You are not logged in, please do so at the top of the page.

Recent Posts in Protecting Patients:

Blue Cross's taste of what's to come if health reform fails

Those of us who have health insurance--or think we have health insurance--can get complacent about whether the nation needs that big, complicated health reform legislation. But just try getting sick. Is your insurance even real? If it is, can you afford it after the latest round of price hikes? Is your deductible so big that paying it will mean financial ruin? Check out these stories and think about what the White House and Congress, by wimping out again on health reform, will condemn all of us to...

Read More »

Dateline NBC on why being insured isn't same as being covered

Here's the full link to last night's excellent Dateline NBC "Critical Condition," which followed insured patients as they were turned down by their health insurers for critical care.

Read More »

Reform or no reform, insurers will weasel on "out of network" loopholes

The Washington Post today has an eye-opening story today on how a family ended up in crushing debt at an "in-network" hospital apparently jammed with out-of-network doctors. Tens of thousands of dollars later, their little boy's rare and deadly heart defect is at least semi-fixed, but the family finances are in ruins. It's a problem that won't be fixed by reforms that rely on the private insurance industry. But it's also a problem that Congress can partly cure, with or without bigger reforms.

Read More »

MLK and the Massachusetts Senate Disaster

Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. said little about health care, though the one fragment that is quoted leaves no doubt about where he stood: “Of all the forms of inequality, injustice in health care is the most shocking and the most inhumane.” The quote is hard to confirm, but health care proponents losing ground to a fear campaign need King's power to stoke determination in the service of hope.

Read More »

Patient protections are California's to lose

California has been a leader in patients rights, largely in response to abuses  by HMOs that, for instance, tried to eject new mothers and babies from the hospital a few hours after giving birth, and attempted to require "drive-by mastectomies."  The federal health reform bill could weaken or do away with all that, including a right to HIV/AIDS testing. Rep. Jackie Speier of San Mateo is leading a tough fight to preserve such rights, and so is Consumer Watchdog.

Read More »

View All Next »

Forward This Page To A Friend

Excerpts From Jamie Court's Dateline Interview Covering Health Insurer Hell

Heath Insurers Coercing Employees Into Political Action?