Drug companies and banks: Bedfellows in abuse

I don't think readers will be too surprised to discover this. Drug companies are jacking up their prices in advance of new laws that might rein in their abuses. Just like credit card interest rates are through the roof, in the high teens for good customers and up to 30% overall, in advance of new regulation.

A New York Times investigation published today shows that drug makers are ratcheting up wholesale prices even as inflation goes negative.

DRUG DOLLAR.pngThe Times story says:
Even as drug makers promise to support Washington’s health care overhaul by shaving $8 billion a year off the nation’s drug costs after the legislation takes effect, the industry has been raising its prices at the fastest rate in years.
In the last year, the industry has raised the wholesale prices of brand-name prescription drugs by about 9 percent, according to industry analysts. That will add more than $10 billion to the nation’s drug bill, which is on track to exceed $300 billion this year. By at least one analysis, it is the highest annual rate of inflation for drug prices since 1992.
The drug trend is distinctly at odds with the direction of the Consumer Price Index, which has fallen by 1.3 percent in the last year.

So the drug makers' pledge to cut drug prices for seniors by $8 billion a year will actually be a price increase of $2 billion a year, and rising. In exchange for that "promise," the White House promised not to introduce tougher regulation. My favorite quote in the NYT story is from the Merck pharmaceuticals spokespuppet: “Price adjustments for our products have no connection to health care reform.”

Right. If you believe that, you'd buy the argument that banks are raising your credit card rates and shutting down your credit line because the banks (i.e. themselves) are forcing them to. Or that gigantic health insurance conglomerates like United Health Group (the largest supplier of prescription drugs to seniors) are pushing their employees to lobby Congress against health reform because they believe in free speech. Or even that the banks and financiers whose mortgage and energy price manipulations crashed the economy don't need new regulation because they'll promise to control themselves (like a toddler promising not to grab stuff in the supermarket again?).

What also grates me is how the corporate spokespuppets slam groups like Consumer Watchdog when we point out what they're doing (as in all of the above), saying we're just trying to hurt their business, or we're naive.

The latest such statement came from United Health Group, whose spokesman told the Minneapolis Star Tribune (the company's hometown paper),  "I find it somewhat offensive that an outside group is seeking to muzzle our employees." 

He certainly has the location of the muzzle wrong. It belongs on companies that coerce their employees to become corporate ventriloquists' dummies.  

Rate This Article:

Comments:

Post A Comment

You are not logged in, please do so at the top of the page.

Recent Posts in Protecting Patients:

Yep, employer healthcare costs more, and it's employees paying for it

Corporations are shoving all of the increased cost of worker healthcare, and more, onto their employees, says a new study. And that's on top of news that companies are sitting on loads of cash while refusing to hire laid-off workers. Please pass the salt to rub in our wounds.

Read More »

Will 'progressives' let middle class burn to prove their point?

When Anthem Blue Cross announced its controversial premium increases in California recently, the insurer claimed, "a carrier must be able to receive actuarially sound rates." So it is remarkable that "progressive" San Francisco State Senator Mark Leno, a single payer health care advocate, recently introduced eleventh hour legislation codifying Anthem Blue Cross's "actuarially sound" defense of premium increases in law.

Read More »

New rates at Blue Cross are a meager victory

At the shoe store, 40% off qualifies as at least pretty good. So why does regulators' approval of new, lower rates by Blue Cross of California not feel like victory? There are lots of reasons, but first is that the revised Blue Cross rate hikes are still in double digits, averaging 14% and as high as 20%, while average wages are still falling. And Blue Cross could announce another rate hike whenever it pleases, just as many insurers continue to do.

Read More »

Health reform regulation scorecard: The big stuff is headed to court

Wouldn't it be great if we could all deduct our federal income and investment taxes from next year's income? And if we could also deduct that stress-reducing trip to a spa in Bora Bora? And if the government would just take our word for it? Fantasy for us, but the health insurance industry think that's what federal health reform ought to allow, on a corporate scale.

Read More »

Seattle Story: Pretty good ending

The worst definitely didn't happen in Seattle. The National Association of Insurance Commissioners deferred the worst insurance industry demands for weakening the implementation of health care reform. For a body so closely linked to...

Read More »

View All Next »

Forward This Page To A Friend

CA Hospitals Risk Collapse In Earthquake