Google has defended its online book deal amid reports it is being reviewed by the US justice department.
An investigation is expected to examine whether or not the book search
agreement with authors and publishers violates anti-trust laws.
Google reached a settlement in October to create a $125m (£85m) fund to pay authors to have their work digitised.
The deal still needs court approval and this week the deadline was extended to September for others to oppose it.
Now that the justice department has become involved, Google has taken
to the blogosphere with a post explaining the benefits of putting
millions and millions of books online.
"As the discussion continues, it’s important to
understand what readers stand to gain," wrote Adam Smith, the director
of product management for Google Book Search.
In his post, Mr. Smith outlined a number of scenarios
where readers could benefit. These include being able to access
out-of-print, or so-called "orphaned" books where the authors cannot be
found, as well as being able to get hold of more books in foreign
languages.
For authors, Google also stressed the positives.
"The settlement won’t just expand access to out-of-print books, either," said Mr Smith.
"Because authors and publishers will have the ability to let users
preview and purchase their in-print books through Google Book Search,
readers will have even more options for accessing in-print books than
they have today."
‘Monopolistic situation’
The Google settlement was reached following earlier legal action by the
Authors Guild and the Association of American Publishers.
That suit claimed that Google’s practice of scanning
copyrighted books from libraries for use in its Book Search service was
a violation of copyrights.
Both organisations refused to comment on the story.
The Department of Justice also declined to give a statement. Its
involvement does not necessarily mean it will attempt to scuttle the
deal, which critics have said would unfairly give Google an exclusive
licence to profit from millions of books.
Some librarians have said they fear that with no
competition Google would be free to raise prices to access the
collection.
Consumer Watchdog told the BBC it was one of a
number of groups involved in calling on the Department of Justice to
act.
"We felt the deal set up an unfair monopolistic situation for Google," explained Consumer Watchdog advocate John M. Simpson.
"We do need to have the world’s books digitized but I think there are
very big concerns if one internet giant is able to dominate the digital
market. We want a level playing field here," Mr. Simpson said.
The deal currently only applies in the US, but Google’s
Adam Smith said: "We believe that this will constitute an unprecedented
test bed for the development of similar services around the world."
