Consumer Group Calls on Google To Match Yahoo!'s Data Retention Policy, Offer Additional Privacy Guarantee; Warns That Personal Data Remains on Search Companies' Servers

Santa Monica, CA -- Internet giant Google must match new privacy measures announced by search rival Yahoo!, Consumer Watchdog said today, and called on both companies to enact stronger protections to truly guarantee users’ privacy. The nonprofit, nonpartisan consumer group warned the public that even with shorter data retention times, identifiable personal data remains on the search companies’ servers because each point of contact renews the data retention window.
 
Since many users of Google or Yahoo! return on a daily basis, they are constantly providing a new stream of personal data. Users must be able to control their data and browse anonymously if they choose, the group said. Consumer Watchdog called for a zero retention policy or at least one as good as IXQuick, a search engine company in the Netherlands that says it will delete personal data after 48 hours.

Yahoo! said it would anonymize personal data collected during Internet searches after 90 days. It had previously held the data for 13 months.  In September Google said it would anonymize data after nine months, halving its retention time.  Microsoft stores the information for 18 months, but has said it would move to a six-month retention policy if the other search providers matched the request. Yahoo!'s move is a step in the right direction, but if Google is sincere about commitments to users' privacy, the company must take further steps, the nonpartisan, nonprofit consumer group said.

"With Google and Yahoo! the time clock begins again every time a user returns,” said John M. Simpson, privacy advocate with Consumer Watchdog. “Because most users return daily, only a zero retention policy and full anonymization will safeguard the privacy of the public.”

To guarantee privacy, Consumer Watchdog has called on Google to give users of its services: 1) control over their private data; 2) transparency about how their data is gathered and used; and, 3) the right to give informed consent through “opt in” functions, rather than having to sift through pages in order to “opt out.”

"Google, as the industry leader, should be setting the gold standard for privacy," said John M. Simpson, Consumer Advocate with Consumer Watchdog. "Instead they've abdicated their responsibilities to users and are leaving innovation to rival Yahoo! who is struggling to stay alive."
 
All search companies need to be much more transparent about how they 'anonymize' the personal data they have stored, Consumer Watchdog said. "If data is not completely anonymous, this is nothing more than PR,” said Simpson.

View videos that demonstrate how users are in an unnoticed conversation with Google when they use its services at www.consumerwatchdog.org/google.

- 30 -

Consumer Watchdog, formerly The Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights, is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization.

Rate This Article:

Comments:

Post A Comment

You are not logged in, please do so at the top of the page.

Recent Posts in Fighting Corporateering:

Google facing close DOJ scrutiny on ITA

Despite what the spinmeisters over at Google's Public Policy Blog would have you believe, the Internet giant is facing tough...

Read More »

Health reform regulation scorecard: The big stuff is headed to court

Wouldn't it be great if we could all deduct our federal income and investment taxes from next year's income? And if we could also deduct that stress-reducing trip to a spa in Bora Bora? And if the government would just take our word for it? Fantasy for us, but the health insurance industry think that's what federal health reform ought to allow, on a corporate scale.

Read More »

Four House members blast Google-Verizon plan; call on FCC to act

Four members of the House Energy and Commerce Committee’s Subcommittee on Communications, Technology, and the Internet, on Monday ...

Read More »

" Do Not Track Me" gains traction in Washington

I'm just back from a sweltering week in Washington, DC, convinced that those of us who care about protecting consumers' online privacy have reason for optimism.  There is growing interest in creating a "Do Not Track...

Read More »

Saturday in Seattle: Live demonstrators, zombie insurance lawyers, someone's caving to lobbyists

It's livelier Saturday at the National Association of Insurance Commissioners meeting in Seattle. Most refreshing was a medium-sized street demonstration, with forays into meeting rooms, by young and old demonstrators protesting lobbyist influence on health care reform. They handed out "lobbyist disinfectant packs," including soap and face masks, and demanded that regulators do their job for consumers. The sponsor was the "Puget Sound Alliance for Retired Americans," and it was backed by Health Care for America Now, a national group that is finally engaging with vigor on regulation issues.

Read More »

View All Next »

Forward This Page To A Friend

Why Won't Congress Look Into Google's Wi-Spy Scandal?