Internal Documents Show How Andy Stern And SEIU Sold Out Nursing Home Workers And Patients

Santa Monica, CA -- The Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights made public today internal memos and agreements between Andy Stern's Service Employees International Union (SEIU) and nursing home operators that show just how Stern sold nursing home workers out. The nursing home workers lost their rights to strike, complain publicly about quality of care problems and improve their pay and benefits under the secret Stern-backed agreements with nursing home owners.

Nursing home operators got the unions' lobbying clout for more Medicaid dollars, for tort reform measures and against safe staffing requirements in nursing homes. SEIU got the right to represent workers, if shoddily, and to receive dues.

"Nursing homes are a sector where caregivers are the eyes, the ears and the witnesses when there is abuse," said FTCR President Jamie Court. "To tie their hands and to tie their tongues is to let people die. That's immoral and a terrible thing for a nursing home worker to have to live with. I've never seen a labor union except for the SEIU enter into a top-down, industry-friendly agreement that binds the hands of the workers."

The documents, which are the subject of a San Francisco Weekly article about Andy Stern today ( http://www.sfweekly.com/2007-04-11/news/union-disunity/print ) are available at the following links:

Agreement to Advance the Future of Nursing Home Care in Washington:
http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/resources/AgreementAdvanceNHCareWA.pdf

Agreement to Advance the Future of Nursing Home Care in California:
http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/resources/AgreementAdvanceNHCareCA.pdf

CA Alliance to Advance Nursing Home Care, Inc. Board Meeting Agenda:
http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/resources/CAANHCBoardMtgAgenda.pdf

CA Alliance Agreement: Lessons Learned -- Union Members Own Criticism of The Agreements:
http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/resources/CAAllianceAgreement.pdf

Report on Alliance Negotiations:
http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/resources/ReportAllianceNegotiations.pdf

The SF Weekly's Matt Smith reports:

"Under the 2003 lobbying pact, all nursing home workers entering the union under the auspices of the agreement would work under uniform, employer-friendly labor contracts called "template agreements."

These agreements specify that the union is not allowed to report health care violations to state regulators, to other public officials, or to journalists, except in cases where the employees are required by law to report egregious cases of neglect and abuse to the state. The agreements also prohibit the unionized workers from picketing, and negotiating improvements in health care or other benefits. They prohibit the workers from having a say in their job conditions.

According to the template contract, employers have the "exclusive right to manage the business."

This means the owners set pay rates, pay increases, and incentive plans. They hire, lay off, demote, discipline, and determine benefits for workers without union input. The employers may outsource work performed by union members, and speed up, reassign, or eliminate jobs at will. The employer may eliminate vacations, or any other time off, as the employer sees fit.

The agreement also guarantees that workers' wages will not put an employer at an "economic disadvantage," either through employee pay, benefits, or through staff-per-patient ratios.

To advocates for health care consumers, contract language guaranteeing the union will refrain from reporting poor nursing home conditions to state regulators is particularly appalling."

- 30 -

FTCR is a nonprofit, nonpartisan consumer group. Learn more at www.ConsumerWatchdog.org

Rate This Article:

Comments:

Post A Comment

You are not logged in, please do so at the top of the page.

Recent Posts in Protecting Patients:

Will 'progressives' let middle class burn to prove their point?

When Anthem Blue Cross announced its controversial premium increases in California recently, the insurer claimed, "a carrier must be able to receive actuarially sound rates." So it is remarkable that "progressive" San Francisco State Senator Mark Leno, a single payer health care advocate, recently introduced eleventh hour legislation codifying Anthem Blue Cross's "actuarially sound" defense of premium increases in law.

Read More »

New rates at Blue Cross are a meager victory

At the shoe store, 40% off qualifies as at least pretty good. So why does regulators' approval of new, lower rates by Blue Cross of California not feel like victory? There are lots of reasons, but first is that the revised Blue Cross rate hikes are still in double digits, averaging 14% and as high as 20%, while average wages are still falling. And Blue Cross could announce another rate hike whenever it pleases, just as many insurers continue to do.

Read More »

Health reform regulation scorecard: The big stuff is headed to court

Wouldn't it be great if we could all deduct our federal income and investment taxes from next year's income? And if we could also deduct that stress-reducing trip to a spa in Bora Bora? And if the government would just take our word for it? Fantasy for us, but the health insurance industry think that's what federal health reform ought to allow, on a corporate scale.

Read More »

Seattle Story: Pretty good ending

The worst definitely didn't happen in Seattle. The National Association of Insurance Commissioners deferred the worst insurance industry demands for weakening the implementation of health care reform. For a body so closely linked to...

Read More »

Obama's victory lap in rush hour gridlocks LA to raise $1 million for Congress

It took my wife an hour and half to make the two mile commute home Monday, after the secret service closed some of LA's busiest streets at rush hour to shuttle the president from his Beverly Hills hotel to a fundraiser for Congress...

Read More »

View All Next »

Forward This Page To A Friend

CA Hospitals Risk Collapse In Earthquake