Health Savings Accounts Are Ill-Advised

Former Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle's decision Tuesday to withdraw as nominee for secretary of Health and Human Services was a setback for President Obama's goal of reforming the U.S. healthcare system.

What could that mean for you? Three words: health savings account.

As healthcare costs for employers continue to soar, and as hopes fade for quick relief from Washington, a growing number of businesses are expected to stop offering costly insurance benefits and push workers instead into tax-free health savings accounts.

Proponents of the accounts, which operate like 401(k)s for medical expenses, say they give people more control over their healthcare spending. They also say people become savvier medical consumers when they're more aware of the costs of treatments and procedures.

Critics of health savings accounts counter that the plans favor the healthy and wealthy, and can increase medical costs for everyone else by requiring people to take out high-deductible insurance policies that kick in only after thousands of dollars in healthcare expenses have been rung up.

"Most people can't even afford to put money into the account," said Jerry Flanagan, health policy director for Consumer Watchdog in Santa Monica. "All the money goes into premiums and deductibles."

Health savings accounts were introduced five years ago as an alternative to traditional employer-based health coverage. Although they were championed by former President Bush as a way for Americans to exercise more control over healthcare spending, most employers have been wary of embracing them.

According to a recent report from the Government Accountability Office, only about 2% of the more than 200 million Americans with private insurance have opted for health savings accounts.

But market researcher Diamond Management & Technology Consultants predicted in a report last month that as many as 10 million Americans would be enrolled in health savings accounts by next year, or about twice the number in 2007.

Larger employers remain wary of saddling workers with high-deductible insurance plans, Diamond found, but smaller businesses are increasingly turning to health savings accounts as a way to ease runaway healthcare costs.

"Small employers want to do the right thing," said Karen Pollitz, a research professor at Georgetown University's Health Policy Institute. "They want to provide healthcare. But each year they have less money."

Health savings accounts, she said, "give employers an opportunity to shift more healthcare costs onto employees."

However, this also leaves employees increasingly at the mercy of insurance companies offering "HSA-compatible" policies.

Sherman Oaks lawyer Ellen Kornblum, 51, thought she was getting her healthcare expenses under control when she opened a health savings account a couple of years ago.

Although she was wary of the $3,500 deductible that came with the eligible policy offered by her insurer, Anthem Blue Cross, Kornblum was pleased that her annual premiums had been reduced to $2,544.

As of March 1, however, Anthem plans to raise rates for thousands of policyholders statewide. In Kornblum's case, that will mean a whopping 25% increase to $3,192 in premiums.

"I'm OK with a plan that has a low premium and a high deductible," she told me. "I don't like a plan that has a high premium and a high deductible." Kornblum said she might now switch back to a pricier policy with a lower deductible.

Jerry Slowey, an Anthem spokesman, said the company's higher premiums reflected rising healthcare costs across the board.

"The increasing need for medical services, the use of new, expensive prescription drugs and advanced technologies are driving up the cost of healthcare," he said. "We understand and share the concerns of our members over rising healthcare costs and higher premiums."

That's nice. But Pollitz at Georgetown University said insurers such as Anthem were just playing the odds.

"They sell you the policy on the assumption that you won't make any claims right away," she said. "But over time they know you will make claims. That's why insurers don't want you sticking around too long with lower premiums."

That's one of the fundamental flaws of health savings accounts -- the notion that affordable insurance plans will be available to meet healthcare needs.

Federal law requires account holders to be responsible for at least the first $1,100 in annual costs ($2,200 for family policies). In reality, many eligible policies come with deductibles three times that amount.

Another issue is that health savings account holders, as with 401(k) holders, may be tempted to invest their money in mutual funds offering the best potential for capital gains. That sounds fine in theory.

In reality, would you want your healthcare nest egg to take the same beating your retirement fund took over the last year? What if, God forbid, you actually needed it?

Just as most employers found pension plans to be unsustainable and have turned instead to 401(k)s to meet workers' retirement needs, so too will they increasingly move away from group insurance policies and adopt health savings accounts.

And, as with 401(k)s, they'll soften the blow by contributing to employees' accounts, at least for a while.

"There's a seductive notion that some healthcare is better than none," Pollitz said. "But that's not really the case. You wouldn't say that part of an air bag is better than none. You need complete protection."

When you take into account Medicare, Medicaid, veterans assistance and similar programs, it turns out that more than half of all Americans are already receiving health coverage from the government.

Want to help working families and cash-strapped businesses? Extend Medicare to everyone, with employers and workers covering the tab with tax money, rather than premiums, deductibles and co-pays.

It may not be a perfect solution, but it's a lot better than most of the alternatives out there. Whoever's next in line behind Daschle should make it a priority.

David Lazarus' column runs Wednesdays and Sundays. Send your tips or feedback to david.lazarus@latimes.com.

Rate This Article:

Comments:

Post A Comment

You are not logged in, please do so at the top of the page.

Response to Health Savings Accounts are ill adivsed

It is just amazing at the lack of logic and common financial sense that is demonstrated in articles concerning High Deductible Health Plans and HSAs.  Please answer these questions:

1.  If an employer charges their employees $500 a month premium for family health coverage in a traditional low deductible/copay plan, is that employee not out of pocket at least $6,000 per year in premiums alone, regardless of whether they are sick or healthy? 

2.  If an employer could offer a High Deductible Health Plan and an HSA say at $100 a month for family coverage with a deductible of $5,000 a year, wouldn't that employee come out basically even with the premium savings if they had to pay the full deductible? 

3.  Wouldn't that employee be much better off if he was healthy and did not reach the full deductible and was able to save those unspent premium dollars in an HSA? 

4.  Since very few individuals have high medical claims cost year after year and the fact that the 80/20 rule still pretty much applies regarding 80% of claims are incurred by 20% of the population, wouldn't a strategy of helping employees build up an HSA during good years to pay the high deductibles in bad years be in their best financial insterest rather than just giving the money to an insurance company? 

5.  Wouldn't it be a refreshing change if employees could go in for an office visit and actually knew what the total cost of that visit really was, and not think that they were getting that service for a $10 copay?  

I have created such a plan offering for over 1300 employees, but we have had such good participation and experience that we have been able to provide this HDHP coverage at no employee premium, plus the employer puts $750 per year into the HSA.  We have over 70% of our employees voluntarily electing this option, and our costs with the actual claims and HSA contribution put us well below national averages. 

We really need to rethink the delivery of health care in this country, getting more transparancy in fees, getting the insurance company's hands out of the cookie jar, and get finally get a market-based drivers into the delivery.   

February 05, 2009 11:30 AM | brbett07 |

Recent Posts in Protecting Patients:

Blue Cross's taste of what's to come if health reform fails

Those of us who have health insurance--or think we have health insurance--can get complacent about whether the nation needs that big, complicated health reform legislation. But just try getting sick. Is your insurance even real? If it is, can you afford it after the latest round of price hikes? Is your deductible so big that paying it will mean financial ruin? Check out these stories and think about what the White House and Congress, by wimping out again on health reform, will condemn all of us to...

Read More »

Dateline NBC on why being insured isn't same as being covered

Here's the full link to last night's excellent Dateline NBC "Critical Condition," which followed insured patients as they were turned down by their health insurers for critical care.

Read More »

Reform or no reform, insurers will weasel on "out of network" loopholes

The Washington Post today has an eye-opening story today on how a family ended up in crushing debt at an "in-network" hospital apparently jammed with out-of-network doctors. Tens of thousands of dollars later, their little boy's rare and deadly heart defect is at least semi-fixed, but the family finances are in ruins. It's a problem that won't be fixed by reforms that rely on the private insurance industry. But it's also a problem that Congress can partly cure, with or without bigger reforms.

Read More »

MLK and the Massachusetts Senate Disaster

Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. said little about health care, though the one fragment that is quoted leaves no doubt about where he stood: “Of all the forms of inequality, injustice in health care is the most shocking and the most inhumane.” The quote is hard to confirm, but health care proponents losing ground to a fear campaign need King's power to stoke determination in the service of hope.

Read More »

Patient protections are California's to lose

California has been a leader in patients rights, largely in response to abuses  by HMOs that, for instance, tried to eject new mothers and babies from the hospital a few hours after giving birth, and attempted to require "drive-by mastectomies."  The federal health reform bill could weaken or do away with all that, including a right to HIV/AIDS testing. Rep. Jackie Speier of San Mateo is leading a tough fight to preserve such rights, and so is Consumer Watchdog.

Read More »

View All Next »

Forward This Page To A Friend

Excerpts From Jamie Court's Dateline Interview Covering Health Insurer Hell

Heath Insurers Coercing Employees Into Political Action?