Six In 10 Americans Support Opening Medicare as a "Public Option" to the Private Insurance Market; Public Willing To Pay Through Payroll Deductions

Washington, D.C. -- Deep public dissatisfaction with the current health insurance system is evident in a new poll showing that 64% of Americans support expanding Medicare as a choice for anyone who wants an option to the private insurance market. The poll numbers illustrate unease with rising premiums, diminishing benefits and loss of health coverage when a job disappears.
 
Download the poll here.

The poll also found that 60% of respondents want a Medicare-for-anyone option even after hearing that they would have to pay—sharing the cost of the coverage with their employer through increased Medicare payroll deductions, instead of paying private health insurance premiums.
 
“Americans overwhelmingly believe that they should not have to wait until they are 65 years old or become disabled to have access to Medicare,” said Jamie Court, president of Consumer Watchdog. “This poll shows that Americans in the midst of financial crisis are willing to pay for access to Medicare because of their insecurity about losing their health coverage and the high price of private health insurance.”
 
The poll, part of an independent national consumer product marketing survey by CARAVAN, is based on 863 interviews with registered voters in the United States conducted January 23 through January 26, 2009.  The poll questions were drafted by Grove Insight for Consumer Watchdog.
 
Download the poll cross tabs here.

Download the poll questions here.

President Obama proposed giving Americans a "public option" to the private insurance market as a candidate but has not defined that option.   Consumer Watchdog said President Obama should take the popularity of the idea of opening Medicare to any American regardless of age into account when choosing a point person to lead the White House’s health care efforts. Read more about the “Open Medicare” option and a commentary on the topic.

The Poll also found:

* Government Providers Are Viewed More Favorably Than Private Insurers. Both federal Medicaid (44% favorable, 15% unfavorable) and Medicare (41% favorable, 20% unfavorable) are held in higher esteem than insurance companies (29% favorable, 38% unfavorable) or HMO’s (36% favorable, 32% unfavorable).

* The Tide Appears to Be Shifting in Favor of National Health Insurance. When given a choice of the current health care system or one “like Medicare that is run by the government and financed by taxpayers,” voters chose the latter. A solid majority (59%) say they would prefer a national health insurance program that covers everyone over the current system of private insurance offered to most through their employer.

- 30 -

Consumer Watchdog is a nationally recognized non-partisan consumer advocacy organization.

Learn more at: www.ConsumerWatchdog.org

Rate This Article:

Comments:

Post A Comment

You are not logged in, please do so at the top of the page.

Recent Posts in Protecting Patients:

Blue Cross's taste of what's to come if health reform fails

Those of us who have health insurance--or think we have health insurance--can get complacent about whether the nation needs that big, complicated health reform legislation. But just try getting sick. Is your insurance even real? If it is, can you afford it after the latest round of price hikes? Is your deductible so big that paying it will mean financial ruin? Check out these stories and think about what the White House and Congress, by wimping out again on health reform, will condemn all of us to...

Read More »

Dateline NBC on why being insured isn't same as being covered

Here's the full link to last night's excellent Dateline NBC "Critical Condition," which followed insured patients as they were turned down by their health insurers for critical care.

Read More »

Reform or no reform, insurers will weasel on "out of network" loopholes

The Washington Post today has an eye-opening story today on how a family ended up in crushing debt at an "in-network" hospital apparently jammed with out-of-network doctors. Tens of thousands of dollars later, their little boy's rare and deadly heart defect is at least semi-fixed, but the family finances are in ruins. It's a problem that won't be fixed by reforms that rely on the private insurance industry. But it's also a problem that Congress can partly cure, with or without bigger reforms.

Read More »

MLK and the Massachusetts Senate Disaster

Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. said little about health care, though the one fragment that is quoted leaves no doubt about where he stood: “Of all the forms of inequality, injustice in health care is the most shocking and the most inhumane.” The quote is hard to confirm, but health care proponents losing ground to a fear campaign need King's power to stoke determination in the service of hope.

Read More »

Patient protections are California's to lose

California has been a leader in patients rights, largely in response to abuses  by HMOs that, for instance, tried to eject new mothers and babies from the hospital a few hours after giving birth, and attempted to require "drive-by mastectomies."  The federal health reform bill could weaken or do away with all that, including a right to HIV/AIDS testing. Rep. Jackie Speier of San Mateo is leading a tough fight to preserve such rights, and so is Consumer Watchdog.

Read More »

View All Next »

Forward This Page To A Friend

Excerpts From Jamie Court's Dateline Interview Covering Health Insurer Hell

Heath Insurers Coercing Employees Into Political Action?