Senator Kennedy Shouldn't Give In To HMO Demands

Washington D.C. -- Consumer Watchdog wrote a letter to U.S. Senator Ted Kennedy (D-MA) urging that he continue to protect patients consistent with the principles he has articulated during his 40 year career by demanding a strong public health plan in the Senate’s health care overhaul and resisting mandatory purchase of private insurance policies.

Download Consumer Watchdog's letter to Senator Kennedy.

As the health care reform debate intensifies following the Easter recess, the U.S. Senate is under extreme pressure from the insurance industry to abandon a robust “public option” like opening Medicare to all who wish to buy into it.  In the letter, Consumer Watchdog wrote:

“The right to health care you have championed is not the same as the requirement to buy a private insurance policy,” the consumer advocates wrote Kennedy. "Don’t let the institution of the United States Senate use your name and credibility for something that goes against the principles you fought for your entire life."

Consumer Watchdog, a non-partisan and non-profit consumer advocacy group, reminded Kennedy of his strong statements about distrusting health insurance companies whose financial interests skew their policy recommendations toward increasing profits at the expense of patients. In 1971, prior to the passage of the HMO Act, which Senator Kennedy authored to organize the then-nonprofit HMOs, Kennedy said:

“We cannot expect those with vested interest in the system as it currently exists to support the reforms which are so badly needed. ... The insurance industry has been content to pass the skyrocketing costs of medical care onto the consumer, without ever attempting to effectively to control those costs."

In the letter, Consumer Watchdog wrote of today’s insurer lobbying to curb reforms and require Americans to buy private insurance policies:

"What industry calls compromise—the mandatory purchase requirement—is really capitulation to its demands for a captive market and a taxpayer-funded bailout. . . . You have had more experience than anyone else in Congress of the insurance industry’s broken assurances.  They will not change their world.  You have to change it for them, and a true public option to for-profit insurance is the only sure way to do it."

Consumer Watchdog pointed out that Senator Kennedy could not have predicted in 1973 when President Nixon signed the HMO Act that HMOs would largely shift from non-profit to for-profit companies.  Kennedy did acknowledge the devastating effect of the for-profit health insurance system on patients in a 1992 speech to the Health Insurance Association of America, more than two decades into his battle for U.S. health care. Speaking directly to the insurers, Kennedy said:

“Your private sector role has unquestionably made the crisis worse. ... The message sent out by too many of your member companies is unmistakably clear: don’t insure anyone unless you think they won’t get sick.  And if you make a mistake, do your best to walk away from it.  Do all you can do to stop Congress from acting.”

The letter also praised Kennedy’s notable victories, including the federal Children’s Health Insurance Program, the Health Insurance Portability and Privacy Act and legislation allowing the newly unemployed to purchase continuation of their health insurance.

- 30 -

Rate This Article:

Comments:

Post A Comment

You are not logged in, please do so at the top of the page.

Recent Posts in Protecting Patients:

Blue Cross's taste of what's to come if health reform fails

Those of us who have health insurance--or think we have health insurance--can get complacent about whether the nation needs that big, complicated health reform legislation. But just try getting sick. Is your insurance even real? If it is, can you afford it after the latest round of price hikes? Is your deductible so big that paying it will mean financial ruin? Check out these stories and think about what the White House and Congress, by wimping out again on health reform, will condemn all of us to...

Read More »

Dateline NBC on why being insured isn't same as being covered

Here's the full link to last night's excellent Dateline NBC "Critical Condition," which followed insured patients as they were turned down by their health insurers for critical care.

Read More »

Reform or no reform, insurers will weasel on "out of network" loopholes

The Washington Post today has an eye-opening story today on how a family ended up in crushing debt at an "in-network" hospital apparently jammed with out-of-network doctors. Tens of thousands of dollars later, their little boy's rare and deadly heart defect is at least semi-fixed, but the family finances are in ruins. It's a problem that won't be fixed by reforms that rely on the private insurance industry. But it's also a problem that Congress can partly cure, with or without bigger reforms.

Read More »

MLK and the Massachusetts Senate Disaster

Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. said little about health care, though the one fragment that is quoted leaves no doubt about where he stood: “Of all the forms of inequality, injustice in health care is the most shocking and the most inhumane.” The quote is hard to confirm, but health care proponents losing ground to a fear campaign need King's power to stoke determination in the service of hope.

Read More »

Patient protections are California's to lose

California has been a leader in patients rights, largely in response to abuses  by HMOs that, for instance, tried to eject new mothers and babies from the hospital a few hours after giving birth, and attempted to require "drive-by mastectomies."  The federal health reform bill could weaken or do away with all that, including a right to HIV/AIDS testing. Rep. Jackie Speier of San Mateo is leading a tough fight to preserve such rights, and so is Consumer Watchdog.

Read More »

View All Next »

Forward This Page To A Friend

Excerpts From Jamie Court's Dateline Interview Covering Health Insurer Hell

Heath Insurers Coercing Employees Into Political Action?