SHHH! ... Today's secret Senate Finance Committee hearing on health care

No prying public eyes.  No media.  No Congressional Record.

That's the reality of today's "closed" Senate Finance Committee hearing.  The secret meeting is not even noticed on the committee website.

According to the rules committee, closed committee sessions are very rare except for discussions of national security.  See the rule below -- there does not appear to be any basis for today's private hearing, other than that the committee members don't want you to know what they're saying.

Why do we care about what the Senate Finance Committee is talking about behind those locked doors?  Well, the discussion today is about whether every American will be required to buy health insurance policies with no oversight of what insurers can charge.  Wouldn't you like to know what they're saying about what you'll be required to buy? What if I told you that the plan would require you to show proof of health insurance on your tax return or face hefty tax penalties?

In a letter sent today to Senator Baucus, chair of the Finance Committee, I wrote:

"Americans should not be locked out of any discussion about health care reform, particularly one that will consider whether everyone should be required to buy health insurance policies without any limits on what insurers can charge.  Mandatory purchases of private insurance policies without offering a public alternative to the private market is nothing other than a bailout for HMOs—whose greed, waste and indifference to our health have created the current mess."

Standing Rules of the Senate - RULE XXVI - Committee Procedure

5. (b) Each meeting of a committee, or any subcommittee thereof, including meetings to conduct hearings, shall be open to the public, except that a meeting or series of meetings by a committee or a subcommittee thereof on the same subject for a period of no more than fourteen calendar days may be closed to the public on a motion made and seconded to go into closed session to discuss only whether the matters enumerated in clauses (1) through (6) would require the meeting to be closed, followed immediately by a record vote in open session by a majority of the members of the committee or subcommittee when it is determined that the matters to be discussed or the testimony to be taken at such meeting or meetings

  (1) will disclose matters necessary to be kept secret in the interests of national defense or the confidential conduct of the foreign relations of the United States;

  (2) will relate solely to matters of committee staff personnel or internal staff management or procedure;

  (3) will tend to charge an individual with crime or misconduct, to disgrace or injure the professional standing of an individual, or otherwise to expose an individual to public contempt or obloquy, or will represent a clearly unwarranted invasion of the privacy of an individual;

  (4) will disclose the identity of any informer or law enforcement agent or will disclose any information relating to the investigation or prosecution of a criminal offense that is required to be kept secret in the interests of effective law enforcement;

  (5) will disclose information relating to the trade secrets of financial or commercial information pertaining specifically to a given person if

    (A) an Act of Congress requires the information to be kept confidential by Government officers and employees; or

    (B) the information has been obtained by the Government on a confidential basis, other than through an application by such person for a specific Government financial or other benefit, and is required to be kept secret in order to prevent undue injury to the competitive position of such person; or

  (6) may divulge matters required to be kept confidential under other provisions of law or Government regulations. 

Rate This Article:

Comments:

Post A Comment

You are not logged in, please do so at the top of the page.

Recent Posts in Protecting Patients:

Will 'progressives' let middle class burn to prove their point?

When Anthem Blue Cross announced its controversial premium increases in California recently, the insurer claimed, "a carrier must be able to receive actuarially sound rates." So it is remarkable that "progressive" San Francisco State Senator Mark Leno, a single payer health care advocate, recently introduced eleventh hour legislation codifying Anthem Blue Cross's "actuarially sound" defense of premium increases in law.

Read More »

New rates at Blue Cross are a meager victory

At the shoe store, 40% off qualifies as at least pretty good. So why does regulators' approval of new, lower rates by Blue Cross of California not feel like victory? There are lots of reasons, but first is that the revised Blue Cross rate hikes are still in double digits, averaging 14% and as high as 20%, while average wages are still falling. And Blue Cross could announce another rate hike whenever it pleases, just as many insurers continue to do.

Read More »

Health reform regulation scorecard: The big stuff is headed to court

Wouldn't it be great if we could all deduct our federal income and investment taxes from next year's income? And if we could also deduct that stress-reducing trip to a spa in Bora Bora? And if the government would just take our word for it? Fantasy for us, but the health insurance industry think that's what federal health reform ought to allow, on a corporate scale.

Read More »

Seattle Story: Pretty good ending

The worst definitely didn't happen in Seattle. The National Association of Insurance Commissioners deferred the worst insurance industry demands for weakening the implementation of health care reform. For a body so closely linked to...

Read More »

Obama's victory lap in rush hour gridlocks LA to raise $1 million for Congress

It took my wife an hour and half to make the two mile commute home Monday, after the secret service closed some of LA's busiest streets at rush hour to shuttle the president from his Beverly Hills hotel to a fundraiser for Congress...

Read More »

View All Next »

Forward This Page To A Friend

CA Hospitals Risk Collapse In Earthquake