Is credit card reform real?

I spent a half hour on Larry Mantle's popular Los Angeles Air Talk Show this morning going through the pro's and con's of the credit card reform President Obama is expected to sign this weekend. You can listen to the podcast here.  Not even the credit card industry or the Cato Institute could make a compelling case against the common sense changes.

The bottom line for me is that the legislation does away with the most insidious bait-and-switches in the industry, where the fineprint of the agreement is used against the cardholders to suddenly jack up their interest rates with no notice. 

The bill, which passed the House today and Senate yesterday, would generally bar interest rate increases on existing balances unless a cardholder has failed to make even a minimum payment for 60 days. It would outlaw double-cycle billing, require 45 days’ notice before any interest rate increase and prohibit interest rate increases anytime in the first year that an account is activated. The legislation also would require card companies to apply a consumer’s monthly payment to the debt with the highest interest rate, or to all debts equally.

What didn't it do?  Cap interest rates.  An amendment by Senator Bernie Sanders last week to cap interest rates at between 15% and 18% only got 33 votes on the U.S. Senate Floor.  With banks that issue credit cards receiving virtually free money from the Fed, on top of the hundreds of billions in bailout funds from taxpayers, there's a great case to be made for a national cap on credit card interest. As Congressman Brad Sherman said on Air Talk today, the lack of a cap shows the banks still have a lot of power on the Hill.   

Overall, consumers will have less to worry about from credit companies under the legislation, and in my book that's a victory.  My colleague Harvey Rosenfield has a different take. You can read his analysis here.

Maybe more importantly, President Obama showed the power of his populist pulpit. He needs to use it again soon, to get health care reform back on track. 

Rate This Article:

Comments:

Post A Comment

You are not logged in, please do so at the top of the page.

Recent Posts in Protecting Patients:

Blue Cross's taste of what's to come if health reform fails

Those of us who have health insurance--or think we have health insurance--can get complacent about whether the nation needs that big, complicated health reform legislation. But just try getting sick. Is your insurance even real? If it is, can you afford it after the latest round of price hikes? Is your deductible so big that paying it will mean financial ruin? Check out these stories and think about what the White House and Congress, by wimping out again on health reform, will condemn all of us to...

Read More »

Dateline NBC on why being insured isn't same as being covered

Here's the full link to last night's excellent Dateline NBC "Critical Condition," which followed insured patients as they were turned down by their health insurers for critical care.

Read More »

Reform or no reform, insurers will weasel on "out of network" loopholes

The Washington Post today has an eye-opening story today on how a family ended up in crushing debt at an "in-network" hospital apparently jammed with out-of-network doctors. Tens of thousands of dollars later, their little boy's rare and deadly heart defect is at least semi-fixed, but the family finances are in ruins. It's a problem that won't be fixed by reforms that rely on the private insurance industry. But it's also a problem that Congress can partly cure, with or without bigger reforms.

Read More »

MLK and the Massachusetts Senate Disaster

Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. said little about health care, though the one fragment that is quoted leaves no doubt about where he stood: “Of all the forms of inequality, injustice in health care is the most shocking and the most inhumane.” The quote is hard to confirm, but health care proponents losing ground to a fear campaign need King's power to stoke determination in the service of hope.

Read More »

Patient protections are California's to lose

California has been a leader in patients rights, largely in response to abuses  by HMOs that, for instance, tried to eject new mothers and babies from the hospital a few hours after giving birth, and attempted to require "drive-by mastectomies."  The federal health reform bill could weaken or do away with all that, including a right to HIV/AIDS testing. Rep. Jackie Speier of San Mateo is leading a tough fight to preserve such rights, and so is Consumer Watchdog.

Read More »

View All Next »

Forward This Page To A Friend

Excerpts From Jamie Court's Dateline Interview Covering Health Insurer Hell

Heath Insurers Coercing Employees Into Political Action?