Dems Who Voted "No" On Health Reform Received $568K From Health Insurers & $377K From Drug Companies In 2009

Opponents of Reform Received 15% More In Contributions From Health Industry Than Supporters

Washington D.C. -- Democrats who voted against health care reform legislation passed on Saturday by the U.S. House of Representatives received $568,162 in campaign contributions from insurance companies and $377,943 from drug companies in just the first ten months of 2009, according to an analysis released today by Consumer Watchdog.  (See chart below).

In a related analysis, OpenSecrets.org found that opponents of the House health reform bill received 15 percent more in contributions from the broader health industry than those who supported the measure.  Read the analysis here.

"Insurers and other health care special interests have made a massive down payment to turn health care reform into a government-funded customer delivery system for the fragmented, wasteful private market.  The insurance-medical complex is spending big to eliminate the public option to the private market and reduce reform to a requirement that all Americans buy coverage with no guarantees that they will be protected when they get sick," said Jerry Flanagan of Consumer Watchdog.  "The numbers show that insurance and medical industries are hedging their bets and stacking up chips for future use by shoving money at both sides of the current debate. They're fully aware that the detailed construction of any health reform will occur after the final big votes in Congress. Money spent today will buy access as regulations and follow-up laws are passed under less scrutiny."

In a study released in July, Consumer Watchdog found that health insurers contributed $2.7 million to the top ten members in the House and Senate, while pharmaceutical companies contributed $3.4 million to the top ten members of each chamber. The two industries donated a combined $26.2 million in campaign contributions to the current members of the 111th Congress.  Read more here.

39 House Democrats and all but one of the 177 House Republicans vote against the health reform bill, HR 3962, which passed 220-215.  See the chart below for a list of contributions from insurance companies and pharmaceutical manufacturers to the Democrats opposing the measure.

- 30 -

Consumer Watchdog is a nonpartisan consumer advocacy organization with offices in Washington, D.C. and Santa Monica, CA. Find us on the web at: www.ConsumerWatchdog.org.

Rate This Article:

Comments:

Post A Comment

You are not logged in, please do so at the top of the page.

Recent Posts in Protecting Patients:

Yep, employer healthcare costs more, and it's employees paying for it

Corporations are shoving all of the increased cost of worker healthcare, and more, onto their employees, says a new study. And that's on top of news that companies are sitting on loads of cash while refusing to hire laid-off workers. Please pass the salt to rub in our wounds.

Read More »

Will 'progressives' let middle class burn to prove their point?

When Anthem Blue Cross announced its controversial premium increases in California recently, the insurer claimed, "a carrier must be able to receive actuarially sound rates." So it is remarkable that "progressive" San Francisco State Senator Mark Leno, a single payer health care advocate, recently introduced eleventh hour legislation codifying Anthem Blue Cross's "actuarially sound" defense of premium increases in law.

Read More »

New rates at Blue Cross are a meager victory

At the shoe store, 40% off qualifies as at least pretty good. So why does regulators' approval of new, lower rates by Blue Cross of California not feel like victory? There are lots of reasons, but first is that the revised Blue Cross rate hikes are still in double digits, averaging 14% and as high as 20%, while average wages are still falling. And Blue Cross could announce another rate hike whenever it pleases, just as many insurers continue to do.

Read More »

Health reform regulation scorecard: The big stuff is headed to court

Wouldn't it be great if we could all deduct our federal income and investment taxes from next year's income? And if we could also deduct that stress-reducing trip to a spa in Bora Bora? And if the government would just take our word for it? Fantasy for us, but the health insurance industry think that's what federal health reform ought to allow, on a corporate scale.

Read More »

Seattle Story: Pretty good ending

The worst definitely didn't happen in Seattle. The National Association of Insurance Commissioners deferred the worst insurance industry demands for weakening the implementation of health care reform. For a body so closely linked to...

Read More »

View All Next »

Forward This Page To A Friend

CA Hospitals Risk Collapse In Earthquake